<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KentShaffer.com &#187; Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kentshaffer.com/category/management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kentshaffer.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 17:06:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Importance of Thinking and Doing</title>
		<link>http://www.kentshaffer.com/the-importance-of-thinking-and-doing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kentshaffer.com/the-importance-of-thinking-and-doing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kent Shaffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[w.a. nance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kentshaffer.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Consider this:
Failure can be divided into those who thought and never did and into those who did and never thought.
- W.A. Nance
Now ask yourself:

What am I procrastinating that I should be doing?
What is a priority that I am not prioritizing?
What should I stop doing so I have time to do what is most important?
Do I [...] <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Consider this:</strong></p>
<blockquote><p>Failure can be divided into those who thought and never did and into those who did and never thought.<br />
- W.A. Nance</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Now ask yourself:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>What am I procrastinating that I should be doing?</li>
<li>What is a priority that I am not prioritizing?</li>
<li>What should I stop doing so I have time to do what is most important?</li>
<li>Do I have a wise plan for each goal?</li>
<li>Do I think about the big picture?</li>
<li>Do I think about the little details?</li>
<li>Am I failing? If so, why?</li>
</ul>
<p>However, the biggest question is &#8211; What is failure? The answer is subjective. And it depends on your priorities.</p>
<p>One man&#8217;s failure may be playing video games while another man&#8217;s failure might be not conquering a video game. If you&#8217;ve been dreaming about writing a book, failure may look like playing golf, going to the lake, or watching football instead. If you are dreaming about being a better parent, going to the lake with your kids is probably a wise choice.</p>
<p><strong>To minimize failure:</strong></p>
<p>Identify your goals. Prioritize them. Think and strategize. And then do them according to what&#8217;s most important.</p>
 <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kentshaffer.com/the-importance-of-thinking-and-doing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Back to the Basics (a History of Lego)</title>
		<link>http://www.kentshaffer.com/back-to-the-basics-a-history-of-lego/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kentshaffer.com/back-to-the-basics-a-history-of-lego/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kent Shaffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lego]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the basics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kentshaffer.com/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once we have tasted success for a season, we tend to become bored with the fundamentals that made us successful. We become increasingly excited by innovation and pioneering. We become eager to expand.
This happens to rockstar solo acts and to monolithic corporations. Size doesn&#8217;t matter, and neither does longevity. This zealous drive can be a [...] <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><img class="size-full wp-image-64 alignright" title="Lego Man" src="http://www.kentshaffer.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/lego-man.jpg" alt="" width="141" height="246" /></strong>Once we have tasted success for a season, we tend to become bored with the fundamentals that made us successful. We become increasingly excited by innovation and pioneering. We become eager to expand.</p>
<p>This happens to rockstar solo acts and to monolithic corporations. Size doesn&#8217;t matter, and neither does longevity. This zealous drive can be a good thing, but it becomes dangerous when the basics are forgotten.</p>
<p>Forgetting the basics is the opposite of getting stuck in a rut (i.e., on course but no progress). You are making progress  but not in the right direction. The basics keep you on course, but enthusiasm gives you speed.</p>
<p><strong>A History of Lego</strong></p>
<p>Once upon a time, <a title="When Lego lost its head - and how this toy story got its happy ending  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1234465/When-Lego-lost-head--toy-story-got-happy-ending.html#ixzz0cVvjGPUA" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1234465/When-Lego-lost-head--toy-story-got-happy-ending.html" target="_blank">Lego forgot the basics</a> and almost never recovered. For almost 7 decades (1932-1998), Lego was all profits. Then they lost money and more money to the point that private-equity firms were lining up to buy the remains in 2004.</p>
<p><strong>What happened?</strong></p>
<p>Years of success made Lego complacent, financially inefficient, systematically inefficient, and very overstretched. As <a title="When Lego lost its head - and how this toy story got its happy ending  Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1234465/When-Lego-lost-head--toy-story-got-happy-ending.html#ixzz0cW44oHx8" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1234465/When-Lego-lost-head--toy-story-got-happy-ending.html" target="_blank"><em>The Mail</em></a> puts it:</p>
<blockquote><p>The problem lay not with the product, but with the company&#8217;s attempts in the Nineties to make itself more modern and relevant in the age of video games. It had attempted to broaden its appeal to the young female market; it had tried to become a lifestyle brand with its own lines of clothes and watches; it had built more theme parks. But in doing so it had neglected its core business.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>The Solution</strong></p>
<p>Lego went back to the basics. Essentials were simplified, guarded, and emphasized.</p>
<p>Nonessentials were sold, scraped, or overhauled. Theme parks and video games were sold then licensed. Buildings were sold then leased. Staffing was downsized. Processes were outsourced. And manufacturing was streamlined, including a 60%+ reduction of Lego brick types.</p>
<p>Lego went back to the basics and is growing again because of it. In fact, today Lego is thriving despite the global financial crisis.</p>
<p><strong>The Lesson</strong></p>
<p>As your organization grows and succeeds, be mindful of the basics. Guard your brand, your goals, your core values, and what made you successful in the first place. There may be fast-paced seasons that naturally cause you to focus on something else, but always return to the basics as quickly as possible.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
 <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kentshaffer.com/back-to-the-basics-a-history-of-lego/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Increase Your Productivity with a 24&#8243; Computer Monitor</title>
		<link>http://www.kentshaffer.com/increase-your-productivity-with-a-24-computer-monitor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kentshaffer.com/increase-your-productivity-with-a-24-computer-monitor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kent Shaffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kentshaffer.com/increase-your-productivity-with-a-24-computer-monitor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEC recently commissioned the University of Utah to research how a computer monitor&#8217;s size affects productivity. According to their findings:

Using a 24&#8243; monitor rather than an 18&#8243; monitor can save you 2.5 hours per workday or equivalent to 76 workdays per year.
Widescreen is best for text editing tasks.
&#62;&#62; Two 20&#8243; monitors were 44% faster at [...] <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://necdisplay.com/NewsAndMediaCenter/PressRelease/?pressrelease=5fe82da9-b3bf-48e3-b9b0-492330ed13f7" title="INCREASING MONITOR SIZE TRANSLATES TO HIGHER WORKER PRODUCTIVITY, NEC DISPLAY/UNIVERSITY OF UTAH STUDY FINDS" target="_blank">NEC</a> recently commissioned the University of Utah to research how a computer monitor&#8217;s size affects productivity. According to their findings:</p>
<ul>
<li>Using a 24&#8243; monitor rather than an 18&#8243; monitor can save you 2.5 hours per workday or equivalent to 76 workdays per year.</li>
<li>Widescreen is best for text editing tasks.<br />
&gt;&gt; Two 20&#8243; monitors were <strong>44%</strong> faster at text editing than one 18&#8243; monitor.<br />
&gt;&gt; One 24&#8243; monitor was <strong>52%</strong> faster at text editing than one 18&#8243; monitor.</li>
<li>Dual monitors are best for spreadsheet editing tasks<strong>.</strong><br />
&gt;&gt; Two 20&#8243; monitors were <strong>29%</strong> faster at spreadsheet editing than one 18&#8243; monitor.<br />
&gt;&gt; One 24&#8243; monitor was <strong>26%</strong> faster at spreadsheet editing than one 18&#8243; monitor.</li>
<li>Overall, increasing screen size increases productivity. However, these productivity gains max out and begin to decline once the screen becomes too large. The research shows a 30&#8243; monitor as less efficient than a 26&#8243; monitor but more efficient than a 24&#8243; monitor.</li>
<li>Screen space also affects the amount of satisfaction obtained from the work.</li>
</ul>
<p>For a <a href="http://necdisplay.com/gowide/NEC_Productivity_Study_0208.pdf" title="NEC Productivity Study 2008" target="_blank">PDF from NEC</a> with research highlights, <a href="http://www.necdisplay.com/gowide/" title="Go Wide with NEC Displays" target="_blank">visit their website</a>. NEC also offers a <a href="http://www.necdisplay.com/GoWide/ROICalculator/" title="ROI Calculator" target="_blank">free online tool</a> to calculate how much you or your company can save by changing your monitors. Their research shows that a company of 250 employees can potentially save $2.3 million per year by upgrading their 17&#8243; monitors to 24&#8243; monitors.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/biztech/2008/03/10/bigger-computer-monitors-more-productivity/" title="Bigger Computer Monitors = More Productivity" target="_blank"><em>The Wall Street Journal</em></a>]</p>
 <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kentshaffer.com/increase-your-productivity-with-a-24-computer-monitor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50 Methods for Better Self Management</title>
		<link>http://www.kentshaffer.com/50-methods-for-better-self-management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kentshaffer.com/50-methods-for-better-self-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kent Shaffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kentshaffer.com/50-methods-for-better-self-management/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lifehack recently compiled a list of 50 methods to get things done faster, better, and more easily. Here are my favorite fifteen:

Most Important Tasks (MITs)
 At the start of each day (or the night before) highlight the three or four most important things you have to do in the coming day. Do them first. If [...] <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lifehack.org/articles/productivity/50-tricks-to-get-things-done-faster-better-and-more-easily.html" title="50 Tricks to Get Things Done Faster, Better, and More Easily" target="_blank">Lifehack</a> recently compiled a list of 50 methods to get things done faster, better, and more easily. Here are my favorite fifteen:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Most Important Tasks (MITs)<br />
</strong> At the start of each day (or the night before) highlight the three or four most important things you have to do in the coming day. Do them first. If you get nothing else accomplished aside from your MITs, you’ve still had a pretty productive day.</li>
<li><strong>Inbox Zero</strong><br />
Decide what to do with every email you get, the moment you read it. If there’s something you need to do, either do it or add it to your to-do list and delete or file the email. If it’s something you need for reference, file it. Empty your email inbox every day.</li>
<li><strong>Wake Up Earlier<br />
</strong>Add a productive hour to your day by getting up an hour earlier — before everyone else starts imposing on your time.</li>
<li><strong>Eat the Frog</strong><br />
Do your most unpleasant task first. Based on the saying that if the first thing you do in the morning is eat a frog, the day can only get better from then on.</li>
<li><strong>80/20 Rule (Pareto Principle)</strong><br />
Generally speaking, the 80/20 Principle says that most of our results come from a small portion of our actual work, and conversely, that we spend most of our energy doing things that aren’t ultimately all that important.  Figure out which part of your work has the greatest results and focus as much of your energy as you can on that part.</li>
<li><strong>Time Boxing</strong><br />
Assign a set amount of time per day to work on a task or project. Focus entirely on that one thing during that time. Don’t worry about finishing it, just worry about giving that amount of undivided attention to the project. (Variation: fixed goals. For example, you don’t get up until you’ve written 1,000 words, or processed 10 orders, or whatever.)</li>
<li><strong>Batch Process</strong><br />
Do all your similar tasks together. For example, don’t deal with emails sporadically throughout the day; instead, set aside an hour to go through your email inbox and respond to emails. Do the same with voice mail, phone calls, responding to letters, filing, and so on — any routine, repetitive tasks.</li>
<li><strong>Time Log</strong><br />
Lawyers have to track everything they do in the day and how long they do it so they can bill their clients and remain accountable. You need to be accountable to yourself, so keep track of how much time you really spend on the things that are important to you by tracking your time.</li>
<li><strong>Write It Down</strong><br />
Don’t rely on your memory as your system. Write down the things you need to do, your schedule, anything you might need to refer to, and every passing thought so you can relax, knowing you won’t forget. Use your brain for thinking, use paper or your computer for keeping track of stuff.</li>
<li><strong>Monotasking</strong><br />
We like to think of ourselves as great multitaskers, but we aren’t. What we do when we multitask is devote tiny slices of time to several tasks in rapid succession. Since it takes more than a few minutes (research suggests as long as 20) to really get into a task, we end up working worse and more slowly than if we devoted longer blocks of time to each task, worked until it was done, and moved on to the next one.</li>
<li><strong>Unclutter</strong><br />
Clutter is anything that’s out of place and in the way.  It’s not necessarily neatness — someone can have a rigorously neat workspace and not be able to get anything done.  It’s being able to access what you need, when you need it, without breaking the flow of your work to find it. Figure out what is “clutter” in your working and living spaces, and fix that.</li>
<li><strong>To-Don&#8217;t List</strong><br />
A list of things not to do — useful for keeping track of habits that lead you to be unproductive, like playing online flash games.</li>
<li><strong>No</strong><br />
Learning to say “no” — to new commitments, to interruptions, to anything — is one of the most valuable skills you can develop to keep you focused on your own commitments and give you time to work on them.</li>
<li><strong>Purge</strong><br />
Regularly go through your existing commitments and get rid of anything that is either not helping you advance your own goals or is a regular “sink” of time or energy.</li>
<li><strong>Timer</strong><br />
Tell yourself you will work on a project or task, and only that project or task, for a set amount of time. Set a timer (use a kitchen timer, or use a countdown timer on your computer), and plug away at your work.  When the timer goes off, you’re done — move on to the next project or task.</li>
</ul>
<p>Currently, I use a combination of &#8220;Timer&#8221; and &#8220;Time Log.&#8221; I use <a href="http://www.slimtimer.com/" title="SlimTimer" target="_blank">SlimTimer</a> to track how much time I spend in seven different areas of my work day. And each area has a minimum goal of time for me to invest.</p>
<p>So how do you get things done? What methods have you found that actually work?</p>
 <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kentshaffer.com/50-methods-for-better-self-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to KentShaffer.com!</title>
		<link>http://www.kentshaffer.com/welcome-to-kentshaffercom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kentshaffer.com/welcome-to-kentshaffercom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kent Shaffer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everything Else]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kentshaffer.com/welcome-to-kentshaffercom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for visiting KentShaffer.com.
If you haven&#8217;t done so already, please subscribe to my posts via the RSS feed or via an email subscription.
What&#8217;s this blog about?
I enjoy helping organizations become more effective and successful. There is no niche that holds all the answers, but I will be focusing most of my posts on the [...] <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for visiting KentShaffer.com.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t done so already, please subscribe to my posts <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/KentShaffer" title="Subscribe via the RSS Feed" target="_blank">via the RSS feed</a> or <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/emailverifySubmit?feedId=1612265&amp;loc=en_US" title="Subscribe via an Email Subscription" target="_blank">via an email subscription</a>.</p>
<p><strong>What&#8217;s this blog about?</strong></p>
<p>I enjoy helping organizations become more effective and successful. There is no niche that holds all the answers, but I will be focusing most of my posts on the areas of design, leadership, management, marketing, technology, and culture.</p>
 <i>Sponsored by: <a href="http://www.churchrelevance.com?sponsor=1">AcreScout</a></i> Looking to buy or sell commercial real estate? AcreScout can help.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kentshaffer.com/welcome-to-kentshaffercom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
